Regardless of where you stand on surveillance policy, the structure of this MOU should concern anyone who cares about government accountability and responsible spending.
Once these funds are transferred to the Nashville Downtown Partnership, Metro Council has no authority over how they're spent. No competitive bidding. No public reporting requirements. No ability to audit or intervene if something goes wrong.
When Metro government spends taxpayer money, there are established safeguards. This MOU bypasses all of them by routing funds through a private nonprofit.
| Accountability Measure | Metro Government | Downtown Partnership |
|---|---|---|
| Public Records Requests | ✓ Required | ✗ No obligation |
| Council Budget Oversight | ✓ Annual review | ✗ No authority |
| Competitive Bidding | ✓ Required over threshold | ✗ Private process |
| Metro Audit Authority | ✓ Full access | ✗ No jurisdiction |
| Public Reporting | ✓ Sunshine laws apply | ✗ Voluntary only |
| Contractor Vetting | ✓ Standards apply | ✗ Self-selected |
This structure isn't an accident. The MOU explicitly requires Metro to agree not to apply for these funds—ensuring control permanently stays with the private nonprofit.
The Downtown Partnership's current security contractors have documented histories of misconduct. Under normal procurement, these records would raise serious red flags. Under this MOU, there's no review process.
Faced 62 state violations for allowing employees to impersonate police—32 upheld, resulting in a $64,000 fine. State investigators found Solaren officers wore badges, uniforms, and equipment designed to make the public believe they were actual law enforcement.
A fire in the downtown library parking garage originated in their fourth-floor storage area, causing significant damage to public infrastructure. While the official fire investigation report listed the source as "undetermined," independent reporting and photos after the incident showed dozens of propane tanks stored on site.
These are the entities that would operate $15 million in surveillance equipment. In a normal procurement process, their track records would be evaluated. Under this MOU, there's no such requirement.
Beyond the structural issues, the process surrounding this MOU raises additional concerns:
This isn't about opposing public safety investments. It's about basic principles of accountable governance:
Every dollar of public money should be subject to public oversight. Routing funds through private entities to avoid accountability is wrong regardless of the policy goal.
Public contracts should go through competitive bidding to ensure value and prevent favoritism. This MOU bypasses that process entirely.
Surveillance infrastructure controlled by private entities with no public accountability represents a dangerous expansion of unaccountable power—exactly what limited government principles oppose.
Elected representatives should control public spending. Structures designed to permanently remove Council oversight undermine representative government.
Regardless of your views on surveillance policy, $15 million in public funds deserves public oversight. Council deferred the MOU twice, and now the Mayor is filing resolutions to bypass that process entirely. Tell your council member to vote NO on January 20.
Take Action Now →