What This Means For

🌎 Immigrant Communities in Nashville

The same surveillance tools used by ICE and CBP

What You Need to Know
🔍

Fivecast—included in this MOU—is the same AI surveillance tool that ICE paid ~$4.2 million and CBP paid ~$3.4 million to use for immigration enforcement.

📱

Fivecast monitors social media, builds relationship networks, and uses AI to detect "sentiment and emotion"—including flagging content as potential "radicalization."

🏢

This equipment would be controlled by the Nashville Downtown Partnership—a private nonprofit with no public accountability and no obligation to protect immigrant communities.

⚠️

Once these surveillance tools are in place, there's nothing stopping data sharing with federal agencies—and no Metro oversight to prevent it.

đźš—

LeoSight—also in the MOU—integrates License Plate Recognition (LPR) data, a technology ICE actively uses to track immigrant communities. LeoSight is essentially Fusus rebranded, founded by Fusus's former Chief Revenue Officer.

The ICE Connection

The MOU includes Fivecast—an AI-powered social media surveillance platform developed with Five Eyes intelligence agencies. This isn't speculative. Federal contracts show exactly how immigration enforcement uses this technology:

CBP Contract: $3.4 Million

Customs and Border Protection uses Fivecast to analyze travelers' social media, detecting "sentiment and emotion" in posts. The system flags people for additional scrutiny based on AI interpretation of their online activity.

ICE Contract: ~$4.2 Million

Immigration and Customs Enforcement uses Fivecast for immigration investigations. The platform's network mapping capabilities help identify family members, associates, and community connections.

Fivecast claims access to 8+ billion people records through aggregated third-party databases. It scrapes data from social media platforms, forums, the deep web, and dark web. It builds relationship graphs showing who knows whom, maps "digital footprints," and assigns automated risk scores.

Now imagine this technology in Nashville—operated by a private nonprofit with no accountability to voters, no Metro oversight, and no legal barriers to federal data sharing.

Nashville Has Stood Up Before

Nashville has a history of protecting immigrant communities from federal overreach. This MOU threatens those protections.

2008
Juana Villegas Case
A pregnant woman was shackled during labor under the 287(g) program, sparking national outrage.
2012
287(g) Agreement Ended
After years of community pressure, Davidson County's agreement with ICE was not renewed.
2017
Surveillance Oversight Passed
Metro Council required approval before police deploy surveillance technology or share data with private entities.
2025
Now: The MOU Bypass
This MOU routes surveillance funds through a private nonprofit to avoid the democratic oversight Nashville built.

Why Private Control Makes This Worse

When surveillance technology is operated by government agencies, there are at least some legal constraints—FOIA requests, civil rights protections, elected oversight. When it's operated by a private nonprofit like the Downtown Partnership, those protections evaporate.

The Downtown Partnership has no obligation to:

The contractors they use—like Solaren, which was fined $64,000 for licensing violations after allowing employees to impersonate police—have their own troubling records. These are the entities that would control surveillance tools used by ICE.

And LeoSight—the "Unified Command" platform in the MOU—was founded in March 2025, precisely when Nashville was killing Fusus. It integrates the same technologies: cameras, license plate readers, dispatch data, and even drones. The surveillance industry found a workaround, and it's already written into this agreement.

"Once these funds are transferred, Metro Council will have no authority over how they're spent—or who gets access to the data collected."
— From the MOU analysis

Your Voice Matters

Nashville ended the 287(g) agreement because immigrant communities and their allies spoke up. The same organizing power can stop these surveillance resolutions. The Mayor filed four resolutions to bypass the MOU Council already deferred twice—contact your council member before January 20.

Take Action Now →