✊ Take Action Now
Community survey results are live View Results →
Urgent Update

After Council deferred the MOU, O'Connell filed 4 new resolutions seemingly to bypass the process

Metro Council votes January 20, 2026
Learn More About the January 2026 Resolutions
Council Vote In:
--
Days
--
Hours
--
Min
--
Sec
FUSUS gravestone with zombie hand reaching for Mayor's MOU document

They Keep Coming Back

We keep winning.

Council deferred the MOU twice in December. The Mayor's response? Four new resolutions to bypass it entirely. Same equipment, same grant that funded the Memphis ICE task force. Let's stop them again.

Mayor's signature on MOU

MOU Deferred Twice, Now Bypassed

4 new resolutions vote January 20, 2026

The Short Version

Council deferred the Mayor's $15M surveillance MOU twice in December. His response? File four new resolutions to accept surveillance equipment as "donations"—$3.38M in cameras, armored vehicles, and command trailers—bypassing the MOU process entirely. The same funding mechanism gave $100M to the Memphis Safety Task Force, which includes ICE.

MOU deferred twice in December by Council
🔄 4 new resolutions filed to bypass the MOU
⚠️ Same grant as Memphis ICE task force
📅 January 20 vote—contact your council member
Breaking News
New Investigation
Rich Text
Investigation | ICE Collaboration

In Wake of ICE Killing, O'Connell Files for $3.3M in Policing Gear via Same Grant Used for ICE Collaboration

Two days after Renee Good's killing, Nashville Mayor filed for policing equipment from a grant used for ICE and called for more federal law enforcement "coordination" with local agencies.

January 12, 2026
Read Full Investigation →
More Coverage
Live Results

What Should the $15M Actually Fund?

See how Nashville residents think the grant money should be spent—updated in real time. Survey open until January 25.

Designed to Bypass Democracy

Council deferred the MOU twice—on December 2 and December 16. The Mayor's response? File four new resolutions accepting the same surveillance equipment as "donations," bypassing the MOU process entirely. Here's how this has unfolded:

1

November: MOU submitted with minimal notice

Documents filed Friday before Thanksgiving, designed to transfer $15M to the Nashville Downtown Partnership—a private nonprofit not accountable to voters.

2

December 2: First deferral

Community pushback worked. Council deferred the MOU after residents and council members raised concerns about oversight and civil liberties.

3

December 16: Second deferral

Council voted 19-17 to defer again after stripping LeoSight and Fivecast platforms. The MOU was scheduled for January 20—but the Mayor had other plans.

4

January 9: Mayor files 4 new resolutions

The Mayor's Office filed four resolutions to accept $3.38M in equipment as "donations"—bypassing the MOU process entirely. Dave Rosenberg's email said the MOU has "lost most of its significance."

5

January 20: Council votes on both

Now Council faces both the deferred MOU AND four new resolutions designed to circumvent it. The same surveillance equipment, just a different path to approval.

"The MOU has 'lost most of its significance.'" — Dave Rosenberg, Mayor's Office (proving the MOU claim of "limiting NDP" was always just a scare tactic)

$15 Million in Surveillance Equipment

The equipment list reads like a militarized surveillance wishlist: armored vehicles, AI-powered social media monitoring, real-time camera networks, and mobile command centers.

$15M
In surveillance funds
0
Metro oversight after transfer
Jan 20
Council vote
Under Investigation

"CSC Software, Five Cast"

What is this mystery surveillance software?

WHAT THE MOU ACTUALLY SAYS

"CSC Software, Five Cast — Communication and situational awareness software enabling coordination across multiple safety agencies."

That's the entire description. No vendor details. No capabilities. No cost.

OUR BEST ASSESSMENT

We believe "Five Cast" refers to Fivecast (stylized as one word), an Australian company that provides open-source intelligence (OSINT) surveillance software.

But the MOU's description—"communication and situational awareness"—appears to significantly misrepresent what Fivecast actually does. This is either a mistake or deliberate obscuring.

Fivecast border security marketing showing surveillance capabilities
From Fivecast's marketing materials
Fivecast database showing 8 billion people records
Access to 8+ billion records via third-party databases
IF THIS IS FIVECAST, HERE'S WHAT IT ACTUALLY DOES:
🌐
Mass Data Collection Scrapes surface web, deep web, and dark web. Tracks people across platforms.
😠
Emotion Detection AI flags "sentiment and emotion" in posts—anger, fear, "radicalization."
🔗
Network Mapping Builds relationship graphs. Maps your entire digital footprint.
⚠️
Automated Risk Scoring Flags people based on "threat indicators." No human review required.
Who Uses Fivecast
ICE (~$4.2M) CBP ($3.4M) Defense Security Agency (~$9.1M)

CBP uses it to detect "sentiment and emotion" in travelers. DCSA monitors 2+ million security clearance holders.

WHAT WE DON'T KNOW
  • What is "CSC Software"? We can't identify this product.
  • Is "Five Cast" actually Fivecast? We're making an educated guess.
  • What's the cost? No pricing in the MOU.
  • Which agencies have access? "Multiple safety agencies" isn't specific.
  • What oversight exists? Who approves searches? What's the data retention?
Armored tactical vehicle requested in MOU

Armored Tactical Vehicles

The grant lists a "Tactical Support Post" described as a mobile command post "used by MNPD SWAT." But here's the catch: MNPD can't legally receive these funds—only the Downtown Partnership can.

NDP must purchase the vehicle as grantee of record. Public agencies would use equipment purchased by a private nonprofit—with no public procurement process.

Screenshot from MOU document describing tactical support post
From the MOU's equipment list: "Tactical Support Post... mobile command post that is used by MNPD SWAT"
📡
Mobile Command Posts

Deployable surveillance centers throughout downtown.

📹
Rapid-Deploy Cameras

Camera systems that can be installed anywhere in the district.

🔊
Noise Surveillance

Audio monitoring technology for public spaces.

🖥️
Real-Time Fusion Centers

"Tech Centers" integrating multiple surveillance feeds.

🎥
Centralized Video Walls

Command displays linking public and private cameras.

See for yourself what they want to buy

MOU Exhibit A Page 1 - Equipment list
Exhibit A, Page 1: Equipment and technology the Downtown Partnership would purchase
MOU Exhibit A Page 2 - Equipment list continued
Exhibit A, Page 2: Continued equipment list including surveillance technology
Read the Full MOU and Grant Language (PDF)

The complete Resolution, MOU, and grant documentation for your own review

Nashville Says No

Nashville has repeatedly rejected surveillance overreach. Each time they try, Nashville says no.

What was FUSUS? A real-time surveillance platform that would have linked thousands of private and public cameras into a single network accessible to police. Nashville residents fought it through three years and four council votes—withdrawals in 2023 and 2024, a 20-18 vote in December 2024 that fell one vote short of passage, and finally O'Connell's abandonment in April 2025.

2012
287(g) ICE Agreement Ended

After the Juana Villegas case, Davidson County's six-year 287(g) agreement with ICE lapsed and was not renewed.

2017
Surveillance Technology Oversight

Metro Council passed ordinance BL2017-646 requiring Council approval before police deploy surveillance technology or enter agreements with private entities to share surveillance information.

2022
Facial Recognition Restricted

In February, Metro Council authorized a limited license plate reader pilot program while explicitly declining to approve facial recognition technology.

!
2022-2024
FUSUS: Three Years of Resistance

MNPD contracted with Fusus in September 2022 without council approval. Residents fought back through three council votes: RS2023-2380 withdrawn, RS2024-158 withdrawn, RS2024-792 failed 20-18 in December 2024 (needed 21 to pass).

2025
FUSUS Finally Abandoned

After guardrails passed in March, O'Connell abandoned FUSUS in April 2025, citing "erosions in the rule of law at the federal level." Ironically, Trump's lawlessness killed the surveillance push activists had warned about.

!
2025
$15M Privatized Surveillance Pipeline

They're back—this time routing money through a private nonprofit to bypass the oversight that stopped them before.

Dec 2025
Council Defers MOU 19-17

After public outcry, Metro Council voted 19-17 to defer the $15M MOU after stripping the LeoSight and Fivecast surveillance platforms.

!
Jan 2026
4 "Donation" Resolutions Filed

On January 9, O'Connell filed four resolutions to accept $3.38M in surveillance equipment as direct donations—bypassing the deferred MOU and Metro Code 13.08.080.

!
NOW
Council Vote January 20, 2026

Metro Council will vote on the four donation resolutions. Learn about the resolutions and contact your council member before the vote.

Same Surveillance, Fewer Protections

Mayor O'Connell abandoned Fusus because federal "erosions in the rule of law" made him doubt whether Metro's guardrails would hold. Now he's backing a system with no guardrails at all.

Fusus — Rejected
What O'Connell Said Was Too Risky
  • Public agency control — MNPD would operate the system
  • Council passed guardrails — BL2025-120 established oversight requirements
  • Public records apply — Metro subject to Tennessee open records laws
  • Local accountability — Voters could hold Metro officials responsible
  • Transparent process — Four council votes over three years
Downtown Partnership MOU — Approved
What O'Connell Signed Anyway
  • Private nonprofit control — No public accountability
  • Zero guardrails — Metro explicitly waives oversight
  • No public records — Private entity not subject to FOIA
  • No local accountability — BID not elected by Nashville voters
  • Minimal notice — Filed Friday before Thanksgiving, vote days later
"It's going to be very hard to propose something they would support right now." — Mayor Freddie O'Connell on surveillance, April 2025 Nashville Banner
Why Private Control Makes It Worse, Not Better

Under the Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA), private entities like the Downtown Partnership can share any and all data with law enforcement—no warrant required, no guardrails possible. The same concerns O'Connell cited for abandoning Fusus apply here with even fewer protections. Federal agencies can request data directly from a private nonprofit that has no obligation to refuse.

Nashville Crime Is Already at Historic Lows

According to District Attorney Glenn Funk's office, Nashville is on track for its lowest homicide rate in 60 years and its lowest robbery rate since 1972. Mayor O'Connell himself has emphasized these milestones to state and federal partners. If crime is at historic lows without expanded surveillance, why hand $15 million to a private nonprofit with zero accountability?

LeoSight: Fusus By Another Name

Nashville spent three years saying no to Fusus. It took seven months for the surveillance industry to find a workaround—and it's already in the MOU.

The Smoking Gun: Fusus's Former Chief Revenue Officer Founded LeoSight

In March 2025—at precisely the same time privacy advocates in Nashville killed Fusus and right before O'Connell announced he would not be pursuing it again—the former Chief Revenue Officer of Fusus founded LeoSight.

He spent over three years at Fusus, through Axon's acquisition, helping sell the exact surveillance platform Nashville rejected. Now he's selling the same thing under a different name.

And it's working. Exhibit A of the Downtown Partnership MOU, filed the Friday before Thanksgiving, includes: "CSC Software, Leo Sight: Public Safety software allowing all partners to have situational awareness and communicate via mapping and talk channels."

LeoSight unified command platform interface demonstration

LeoSight's "Unified Command" platform—the same real-time surveillance integration Fusus offered

From Black Ops to Blue Lights: LeoSight was originally developed under the Live Earth brand to support U.S. Special Operations Forces with real-time intelligence during classified operations. Founded in 2015, that same mission-critical surveillance capability now powers law enforcement, fire, rescue, and emergency response teams across the country.

The Same Surveillance Stack

LeoSight integrates the identical surveillance systems as Fusus—creating the same unified command center Nashville already rejected:

CAD Computer-Aided Dispatch
AVL Automatic Vehicle Location
LPR License Plate Recognition
RMS Records Management System
VMS Video Management System
DFR Drone as First Responder
The Timeline: From Fusus CRO to LeoSight CEO
2019-2024
Fusus's Chief Revenue Officer helps build the surveillance platform cities across America adopt
2022
MNPD contracts with Fusus without council approval
2022-2025
Nashville community fights back through four council votes, countless hours of public testimony
March 2025
Fusus's former Chief Revenue Officer founds LeoSight—at precisely the moment Nashville is killing Fusus
April 2025
O'Connell abandons Fusus, says guardrails aren't enough
November 2025
LeoSight appears in Downtown Partnership MOU—filed Friday before Thanksgiving
December 2025
Council defers MOU 19-17 after stripping LeoSight and Fivecast
January 2026
O'Connell files 4 new resolutions to accept equipment as donations, bypassing the MOU

The man who spent three years selling Nashville on Fusus watched the community kill it—then founded a company to sell them the same thing through the back door.

Fusus Pitch

"Officer location, alerts, dispatch data, ALPR overlays and video feeds appear on a single live map so command, field and RTCC teams stay aligned in real time."

LeoSight Pitch

"LeoSight brings law enforcement, fire, and emergency management into one Unified Command platform. Monitor unfolding incidents with a live, map-based view of units, activity, and alerts."

Why Private Control Makes This Worse

When MNPD tried to deploy Fusus, Metro's surveillance ordinance applied. Council had oversight. The community had standing to fight.

The Downtown Partnership is a private nonprofit. Once $15 million transfers:

  • No public records requests
  • No council oversight
  • No surveillance ordinance compliance
  • No accountability to Nashville voters

The former Fusus CRO couldn't get his platform through Metro's front door. Now his new company is walking through the Downtown Partnership's side entrance—and Metro is holding it open.

The Question for January 20

Council members: Did you know the MOU includes surveillance software founded by Fusus's former Chief Revenue Officer?

Did the Mayor's Office?

Did anyone think the community that spent three years fighting this technology deserved to know it was coming back—founded by one of the people who tried to sell it to us the first time?

Different names, same surveillance. The industry will keep rebranding—Nashville must keep saying no.

A History of Problems

The Downtown Partnership outsources security to contractors with documented histories of abuse. These are the entities that would control $15 million in surveillance equipment.

WSMV4 news report on Solaren imposter cops violations

Solaren Risk Management

Faced 62 violations for allowing employees to impersonate police—32 upheld, resulting in a $64,000 fine. State investigators found their officers wore badges, uniforms, and gear designed to make the public believe they were actual law enforcement.

Source: WSMV4 "Thin Blurred Line" Investigation

Block by Block

A fire in the downtown library parking garage originated in their fourth-floor storage area, causing significant damage to public infrastructure. While the official fire investigation report listed the source as "undetermined," independent reporting and photos after the incident showed dozens of propane tanks stored on site.

Source: Nashville Banner

Public benches removed from Korean Veterans Boulevard

Nashville Downtown Partnership

The NDP collaborated with NDOT to remove eight public benches along Korean Veterans Boulevard, replacing them with concrete spheres as a "beautification" project. Advocates accused this of targeting places where Nashville's homeless population is visible—a decision made without public input. If this is how NDP exercises authority over public space, why are we giving them $15 million in surveillance equipment and even more power over downtown?

Source: Nashville Scene

This private entity would control $15 million in surveillance equipment—with zero Metro oversight.

What This Means For You

Different communities face different risks from this surveillance infrastructure. Find information tailored to your concerns:

We've Done This Before.
Let's Do It Again.

The Mayor signed the agreement, but the MOU cannot take effect without Council approval. Your council member needs to hear from you before January 20.

Find Your Council Member →

Your Message:

SUBJECT LINE
MESSAGE

Quick send: Click "Open in Email App" to send to all council members at once, or copy individual sections. Click "Generate New Message" for a fresh version. Don't forget to fill in your personal story!

Spread the Word

This vote is happening fast. Share this page with your neighborhood groups, unions, and community organizations.

Public pressure is the only counterweight to surveillance expansion.

📸 Follow on Instagram for Updates

What Social Media is Saying